2019年，農(nóng)民從納稅人那里得到了數(shù)十億美元，幾乎沒有人反對(duì)

2019年，農(nóng)民從納稅人那里得到了數(shù)十億美元，幾乎沒有人反對(duì)

In 2019. the federal government delivered an extraordinary financial aid package to America's farmers. Farm subsidies jumped to their highest level in fourteen years, most of them paid out without any action by Congress.

2019年，聯(lián)邦政府向美國農(nóng)民提供了一項(xiàng)特別的財(cái)政援助計(jì)劃。農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼躍升至14年來的最高水平，其中大部分是在國會(huì)沒有采取任何行動(dòng)的情況下發(fā)放的。

The money flowed to farms like Robert Henry's. When I visited in early July, many of his fields near New Madrid, Mo., had been flooded for months, preventing him from working in them. The soybeans that he did manage to grow had fallen in value.

這些錢流向了像羅伯特·亨利這樣的農(nóng)場。7月初我去拜訪他時(shí)，他在密蘇里州新馬德里附近的許多田地已經(jīng)淹了好幾個(gè)月，無法在那里工作。他種的大豆已經(jīng)貶值了。

That's when the government stepped in. Some of the aid came from long-familiar programs. Government-subsidized crop insurance covered some of the losses from flooding. Other payments were unprecedented. The U.S. Department of Agriculture simply sent him a check to compensate him for the low prices resulting from the trade war.

這時(shí)政府介入了。一些援助來自人們熟悉已久的項(xiàng)目。政府補(bǔ)貼的農(nóng)作物保險(xiǎn)彌補(bǔ)了洪水造成的部分損失。其他的付款是前所未有的。美國農(nóng)業(yè)部只是給了他一張支票，以補(bǔ)償他在貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)中獲得的低價(jià)。

"'Trump money' is what we call it," Henry said. "It helped a lot. And it's my understanding, they're going to do it again."

“我們管它叫‘特朗普錢’，”亨利說。“這幫了大忙。據(jù)我所知，他們還會(huì)再補(bǔ)貼一次。”

Indeed, a few weeks later, the USDA announced another $16 billion in trade-related aid to farmers. It came on top of the previous year's $12 billion package, for a grand total of $28 billion in two years. About $19 billion of that money had been paid out by the end of 2019. and the rest will be paid in 2020.

事實(shí)上，幾周后，美國農(nóng)業(yè)部宣布向農(nóng)民提供160億美元的貿(mào)易相關(guān)援助。它是在前一年的120億美元的一攬子計(jì)劃之上，兩年內(nèi)總計(jì)280億美元。其中大約190億美元已經(jīng)在2019年底支付出去，其余的將在2020年支付。

"President Trump has great affection for America's farmers and ranchers. He knows that they're fighting the fight and that they're on the front lines," Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue told reporters while announcing the aid package.

“特朗普總統(tǒng)對(duì)美國農(nóng)民和牧場主有著深厚的感情。他知道他們在戰(zhàn)斗，他們在前線，”農(nóng)業(yè)部長桑尼·珀杜在宣布援助方案時(shí)告訴記者。

The announcement aroused little controversy. "I was surprised that it didn't attract more attention," says Joe Glauber, the USDA's former chief economist, who's now a senior research fellow at the International Food Policy Research Institute.

這項(xiàng)宣布沒有引起什么爭議。美國農(nóng)業(yè)部前首席經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家、現(xiàn)為國際糧食政策研究所高級(jí)研究員的喬•格勞伯表示:“我很驚訝它沒有引起更多關(guān)注。”

Glauber says it deserves more attention, for a whole collection of reasons.

格勞伯說，由于各種各樣的原因，它應(yīng)該得到更多的關(guān)注。

For one thing, it's an enormous amount of money, more than the final cost of bailing out the auto industry during the financial crisis of 2008. The auto industry bailout was fiercely debated in Congress. Yet the USDA created this new program out of thin air; it decided that an old law authorizing a USDA program called the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) already gave it the authority to spend this money.

首先，這是一筆巨額資金，超過了2008年金融危機(jī)期間救助汽車業(yè)的最終成本。國會(huì)對(duì)汽車業(yè)救助計(jì)劃進(jìn)行了激烈的辯論。然而，美國農(nóng)業(yè)部憑空創(chuàng)造了這個(gè)新項(xiàng)目;它決定，一項(xiàng)授權(quán)美國農(nóng)業(yè)部一個(gè)名為商品信貸公司(CCC)的項(xiàng)目的舊法律已經(jīng)授權(quán)它使用這筆錢。

"What's unique about this is, [it] didn't go through Congress," Glauber says. Some people have raised questions about whether using the CCC for this new purpose is legal.

格勞伯說:“這件事的獨(dú)特之處在于，它沒有經(jīng)過國會(huì)的批準(zhǔn)。一些人質(zhì)疑將CCC用于這一新目的是否合法。

Glauber sees a risk of "moral hazard" — a situation in which someone is shielded from the consequences of poor decisions. The decision to start the trade war was costly, he says, and the Trump Administration, by tapping the federal treasury, is avoiding the political fallout from that decision. "The sector that is hurt the most, and which would normally complain, all of a sudden it's assuaged by these payments. To me, that's a problem," he says.

格勞伯認(rèn)為這是一種“道德風(fēng)險(xiǎn)”的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)——在這種情況下，人們被保護(hù)起來，不受錯(cuò)誤決策的影響。他說，發(fā)動(dòng)貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)的決定代價(jià)高昂，而特朗普政府通過動(dòng)用聯(lián)邦財(cái)政部，避免了這一決定的政治后果。“受影響最嚴(yán)重的行業(yè)通常會(huì)抱怨，但突然間，這些付款緩解了這種情況。對(duì)我來說，這是個(gè)問題。

Also, the payments are quite generous. According to studies by several independent economists, the USDA is paying farmers roughly twice as much as the actual harm that they suffered from the trade war. And the payments are based on production; the bigger the farm, the bigger the payments. Thousands of farmers got more than $100.000 each. According to an NPR analysis of USDA records of payments made through July 2019. 100.000 individuals collected just over 70 percent of the money.

而且，付款也很慷慨。根據(jù)幾位獨(dú)立經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家的研究，美國農(nóng)業(yè)部付給農(nóng)民的錢大約是他們在貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)中實(shí)際損失的兩倍。并且付款是基于生產(chǎn)的;農(nóng)場越大，支付就越多。成千上萬的農(nóng)民每人得到了超過10萬美元。據(jù)美國國家公共電臺(tái)(NPR)對(duì)美國農(nóng)業(yè)部截至2019年7月的付款記錄進(jìn)行的分析顯示，有10萬人獲得了超過70%的資金。

The USDA has not yet announced whether it will deliver another round of trade-related payments to farmers in 2020.

美國農(nóng)業(yè)部尚未宣布是否會(huì)在2020年向農(nóng)民發(fā)放另一輪與貿(mào)易相關(guān)的補(bǔ)貼。