美司司法部：哈佛招生系統(tǒng)性歧視亞裔美國(guó)人

The Justice Department lent its support Thursday to students who are suing Harvard University over affirmative action policies that they claim discriminate against Asian-American applicants, in a case that could have far-reaching consequences for the use of affirmative action in college admissions.

美國(guó)司法部周四向正在起訴哈佛大學(xué)的學(xué)生提供支持，這些學(xué)生稱(chēng)，該大學(xué)使用平權(quán)行動(dòng)政策，歧視亞裔美國(guó)申請(qǐng)者，這個(gè)案例可能會(huì)對(duì)在大學(xué)招生中使用平權(quán)行動(dòng)產(chǎn)生深遠(yuǎn)影響。

In a statement of interest, the department supported the claims of the plaintiffs, a group of Asian-Americans rejected by Harvard. They contend that Harvard has systematically discriminated against them by artificially capping the number of qualified Asian-Americans from attending the school to advance less-qualified students of other races.

在一份利益聲明中，司法部支持原告，即一群被哈佛拒絕的亞裔美國(guó)人的主張。他們認(rèn)為，哈佛通過(guò)人為限制合格亞裔美國(guó)人的入學(xué)人數(shù)，促進(jìn)其他種族的不合格學(xué)生入學(xué)，從而對(duì)他們構(gòu)成系統(tǒng)性歧視。

“Harvard has failed to carry its demanding burden to show that its use of race does not inflict unlawful racial discrimination on Asian-Americans,” the Justice Department said in its filing.

“哈佛未能承擔(dān)其備受需要的責(zé)任，表明其對(duì)種族因素的使用不會(huì)對(duì)亞裔美國(guó)人造成非法種族歧視，”司法部在提交給法院的文件中稱(chēng)。

The filing said that Harvard “uses a vague ‘personal rating’ that harms Asian-American applicants’ chances for admission and may be infected with racial bias; engages in unlawful racial balancing; and has never seriously considered race-neutral alternatives in its more than 45 years of using race to make admissions decisions.”

該文件稱(chēng)，哈佛“使用模糊的‘個(gè)人評(píng)級(jí)’，可能會(huì)受到種族偏見(jiàn)的影響，損害亞裔美國(guó)申請(qǐng)人的入學(xué)機(jī)會(huì);實(shí)施非法的種族平衡;在超過(guò)45年的時(shí)間里使用種族因素做出錄取決定的過(guò)程中，從未認(rèn)真考慮過(guò)種族中立的其他選項(xiàng)。”

The Justice Department has increasingly used such statements of interest to intervene in civil rights cases. Before 2006, such statements appeared only seven times in civil rights-oriented disputes, according to a recent paper by law school student Victor Zapana. From 2006 to 2011, they were drafted in at least 242, almost all by the Obama administration on issues such as videotaping police brutality and ensuring that blind people and their service dogs have access to Uber.

司法部越來(lái)越多地利用這種利益聲明干預(yù)民權(quán)案件。根據(jù)法學(xué)院學(xué)生維克多.扎帕納(Victor Zapana)最近的一篇論文，在2006年之前，這些聲明在民權(quán)糾紛中只出現(xiàn)了7次。從2006年到2011年，共有至少242個(gè)這樣的聲明，幾乎全由奧巴馬政府起草，例如給警察的殘暴行為拍錄像，以及確保盲人及其導(dǎo)盲犬可以使用優(yōu)步(Uber)。

But the Trump administration is turning the same tool against affirmative action in college admissions, a major — and highly contentious — legacy of the civil rights era, and one that white conservatives have opposed for decades. In the past few years, the anti-affirmative action cause has been joined by Asian-Americans who argue that they are being held to a higher standard, losing out on coveted slots at places like Harvard as African-Americans, Latinos and other groups get a boost.

但特朗普政府正在使用同樣的工具，反對(duì)大學(xué)錄取中的平權(quán)行動(dòng)，它是民權(quán)時(shí)代一個(gè)重大且極具爭(zhēng)議性的遺產(chǎn)，幾十年來(lái)一直遭到白人保守派反對(duì)。在過(guò)去的幾年里，亞裔美國(guó)人加入了反平權(quán)行動(dòng)的行列，他們認(rèn)為自己被適用了更高的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，使得他們?cè)诟?jìng)爭(zhēng)哈佛大學(xué)入學(xué)資格等令人向往的名額時(shí)，敗給非裔美國(guó)人、拉丁裔和其他團(tuán)體。

A handful of states ban public universities from relying on affirmative action, pushing several toward a model that takes socioeconomic factors into account instead of race. Public universities in California and Washington have tried to engineer class-based diversity in their student bodies, believing that giving a lift to lower-income students will end up bringing in more minority students as well.

少數(shù)幾個(gè)州禁止公立大學(xué)依靠平權(quán)行動(dòng)，這令一些大學(xué)推行更多考慮社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)因素而不是種族因素的模式。加利福尼亞州和華盛頓州的公立大學(xué)試圖在他們的學(xué)生中設(shè)計(jì)基于階級(jí)的多樣性，他們認(rèn)為鼓勵(lì)低收入學(xué)生最終會(huì)導(dǎo)致更多的少數(shù)族裔學(xué)生入學(xué)。

But these methods have not produced classes with an ethnic makeup that mirrors that of the states where they have been used, and many selective private universities continue to admit students partly on the basis of race — though, until Harvard was forced to detail its internal admissions policies recently, few could say how elite universities actually weighed applicants’ race.

但是這些方法并沒(méi)有形成能夠反映這些州族裔構(gòu)成的階級(jí)，而且許多擇優(yōu)錄取的私立大學(xué)繼續(xù)部分基于種族錄取學(xué)生——但是，直到最近哈佛被迫詳細(xì)介紹其內(nèi)部招生政策，之前幾乎沒(méi)人能說(shuō)清，精英大學(xué)實(shí)際上對(duì)申請(qǐng)人的種族是如何考慮的。

Now, universities that factor race into admissions have found a powerful new opponent in the Trump administration, which argued in its filing Thursday that the court should deny Harvard’s request to dismiss the case before trial.

現(xiàn)在，在招生中考慮種族因素的大學(xué)在特朗普政府中有了一個(gè)強(qiáng)有力的新對(duì)手，司法部在周四提交的文件中稱(chēng)，法院應(yīng)該否決哈佛在審判前駁回此案的請(qǐng)求。

The government said Supreme Court rulings require universities considering race in admissions meet several standards. They must define their diversity-related goals and show that they cannot meet those goals without using race as a factor in admissions decisions.

政府表示，最高法院的裁決要求，大學(xué)在入學(xué)時(shí)考慮種族因素，需要符合幾個(gè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。它們必須定義與多樣性相關(guān)的目標(biāo)，并表明如果不將種族作為入學(xué)決策的一個(gè)因素就無(wú)法實(shí)現(xiàn)這些目標(biāo)。