男性應(yīng)該使用感性的表情符號(hào)嗎?
Men, you may want to think twice the next time yousend a kissing face or heart-eyes emoji in a textmessage.
男人們,下次你在短信中發(fā)送吻臉或心心眼表情時(shí),可能要三思了。
According to new research published in Frontiers inPsychology, the interpretation of emojis can varydrastically depending on the gender of the sender.
根據(jù)發(fā)表在《心理學(xué)前沿》雜志上的一項(xiàng)新研究表明,表情符號(hào)的解釋可能因?yàn)榘l(fā)送者的性別差異會(huì)有很大的不同。
To examine gender differences in emoji interpretation, psychologists at SouthwesternUniversity recruited 80 undergraduate students to take part in a short experiment. In thisstudy, participants were randomly assigned to one of four experimental groups.
為了研究表情符號(hào)解讀中的性別差異,美國(guó)西南大學(xué)的心理學(xué)家招募了80名大學(xué)生參加一個(gè)簡(jiǎn)短的實(shí)驗(yàn)。 在這項(xiàng)研究中,參與者被隨機(jī)分配到四個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)組。
They were asked to read and evaluate the contents of a text message. The text message, ostensibly sent from one coworker to another, read: "Hey Katie I'm sorry I couldn't come inyesterday. I'm feeling a lot better today though. Thanks for covering my shift."
他們被要求閱讀和評(píng)估短信的內(nèi)容。 這條短信表面上是一個(gè)同事發(fā)給另一個(gè)同事的,上面寫(xiě)著:"嘿,凱蒂,很抱歉我昨天沒(méi)能來(lái)上班。 不過(guò)我今天感覺(jué)好多了。 謝謝你幫我頂班。"
While the words in the text message did not differ between groups, the researcherssystematically varied the perceived gender of the text message sender (Rebecca versusSteven) as well as the emojis displayed at the end of the message (smiling face versus kissingface and heart emoji).
雖然各組的短信中的單詞沒(méi)有差別,但研究人員系統(tǒng)地改變了文本發(fā)送者(瑞貝卡&史蒂芬)的感知性別以及消息末尾顯示的表情符號(hào)(微笑臉&親親&愛(ài)心)
In other words, participants either read the text message sent from Rebecca and ending in asmiling face, sent from Steven and ending in a smiling face, sent from Rebecca and ending in akissing face and heart emoji, or sent from Steven and ending in a kissing face and heart emoji.
換句話說(shuō),參與者要么看的是瑞貝卡發(fā)來(lái)的以微笑臉結(jié)尾的短信,或是史蒂芬發(fā)來(lái)的以微笑臉結(jié)尾的短信,又或是瑞貝卡發(fā)來(lái)的以親親和愛(ài)心符號(hào)結(jié)尾的短信,和史蒂芬發(fā)來(lái)的以親親和愛(ài)心符號(hào)結(jié)尾的短信。
Then, researchers asked participants to evaluate the appropriateness of the text message byindicating their level of agreement with the following statements:
緊接著,研究人員通過(guò)要求參與者們表明對(duì)以下幾種說(shuō)法的贊同程度來(lái)評(píng)估短信的適當(dāng)性
“I would send a message like this to a coworker”
"我會(huì)給同事發(fā)這樣的短信"
“I find this text message acceptable”
"我覺(jué)得這條短信可以接受"
“[Rebecca/Steven] acted professionally in this case”
"瑞貝卡 / 史蒂文在這件事上表現(xiàn)得很專業(yè)"
“The text shows a proper tone between employees”
文字顯示了雇員之間適當(dāng)?shù)恼Z(yǔ)氣
“This message seems inappropriate”
"這條信息似乎不太合適"
Researchers also assessed the likeability of the sender by asking participants to indicateagreement with the following four statements:
研究人員還通過(guò)詢問(wèn)參與者對(duì)以下說(shuō)法的贊同程度來(lái)評(píng)估他們的喜好
I would like to work with someone like [Rebecca/Steven],” “I feel as though I would get alongwell with [Rebecca/Steven],” “[Rebecca/Steven] seems like the kind of person who gets alongwell with others,” and “[Rebecca/Steven] is probably a likable person.”
我想和瑞貝卡和史蒂芬這樣的人一起工作,“”我覺(jué)得我會(huì)和瑞貝卡和史蒂芬相處得很好,“”瑞貝卡和史蒂芬看起來(lái)像是與其他人相處得很好的人,瑞貝卡和史蒂芬可能是非常討人喜歡的人。“
What did they find? Interestingly, there was a stark gender difference in the way the textmessages were perceived.
他們發(fā)現(xiàn)了什么? 有趣的是,人們對(duì)短信的感知方式存在明顯的性別差異。
Consistent with gender stereotypes, texts with affectionate emojis were judged as morelikable and appropriate when they were believed to have come from a woman.
與性別刻板印象相一致的是那些感性符號(hào)被認(rèn)為是女人發(fā)的時(shí),就會(huì)被看做更討人喜歡也更合理;
Furthermore, text messages with friendly emojis (i.e., smiling faces) were judged as equallyappropriate, but more likable, when they were believed to be sent by a man.
此外,帶有感性表情符號(hào)的短信(比如,笑臉)被認(rèn)為是由男性發(fā)送時(shí)也被看做是合適的,也更討人喜歡。
The authors write, "Our findings confirm that people’s perceptions of a message and its sendercan be affected not only by the gender of the sender but also by his or her emoji usage.
作者寫(xiě)道:"我們的研究結(jié)果證實(shí),人們對(duì)信息及其發(fā)送者的看法不僅會(huì)受到發(fā)送者性別的影響,還會(huì)受到表情符號(hào)使用情況的影響。
These findings are consistent with gender stereotypes in communication (e.g., Sullins, 1992; Weisberg et al., 2011; Ling et al., 2014), showing that people generally perceive affectionatelyemotive women as more appropriate than affectionately emotive men."
這些發(fā)現(xiàn)與溝通中的性別刻板印象一致,表明人們普遍認(rèn)為女性的情感豐富較之男性在情感上過(guò)度充盈顯得更合理些。
What wisdom might these results hold for our everyday communications?
這些結(jié)果對(duì)我們的日常交流有什么啟發(fā)呢?
Well, that depends on your gender. If you are a female, both affectionate and friendly emojisappear to be fair game, even in a work setting.
那么,這取決于你的性別。 如果你是一名女性,即使是在工作環(huán)境中,使用感性的表情符號(hào)也無(wú)傷大雅。
Men, on the other hand, might want to exercise caution when using affectionate emojis.
但另一方面,男性在使用感性表情符號(hào)時(shí)就要謹(jǐn)慎了。
That said, men should not shy away from using the occasional friendly emoji. After all, it mayscore them some likability points and, at the very least, it will help break down genderstereotypes in text message communication styles.
也就是說(shuō),男人也不必刻意回避偶爾使用表情符號(hào)。 畢竟,這會(huì)透露出一些可愛(ài)的小意味,至少可以幫助打破通信風(fēng)格中的性別刻板印象。
瘋狂英語(yǔ) 英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)法 新概念英語(yǔ) 走遍美國(guó) 四級(jí)聽(tīng)力 英語(yǔ)音標(biāo) 英語(yǔ)入門(mén) 發(fā)音 美語(yǔ) 四級(jí) 新東方 七年級(jí) 賴世雄 zero是什么意思長(zhǎng)春市好景山莊英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)交流群