CNN News:弗格森警察槍擊黑人少年事件陪審團成立，聽審過程將持續(xù)幾周時間

There`s no cure for Ebola. The vast majority of those who get it, die if they are not treated. Dr. Brantly and Ms. Writebol were treated and also given an experimental drug to help.

現在還沒有治療埃博拉病毒的有效方法，受埃博拉病毒感染的大部分人如果不及時治療的話就會死去。Brantly博士和Writebol女士在接受實驗性藥物治療后病情得到好轉。

It`s not a proving drug, a Spanish priest who`ve got the same medicine died. But doctors say the Americans no longer have virus in their system and we are well enough to go home without any danger of transferring the virus to the public. Dr. Brantly says, it`s a miraculous day.

還不能證明此藥物可以廣泛應用開來，因為一名西班牙牧師在接受同一種藥物治療之后去世。但是醫(yī)生表示兩名美國患者體內已經不再有埃博拉病毒，不會對公眾健康造成影響。Brantly博士表示這真是神奇的一天。

The rain helped keep things calm in Ferguson, Missouri Wednesday night. The town`s been on edge since an unarmed African-American man was shot and killed by a white police officer. Protests, some of them violent, have been almost constant since then. Most are in support of 18-year old Michael Brown. Eyewitnesses say he was trying to surrender when Officer Darren Wilson shot him on August 9. Some demonstrators have turned out to support Officer Wilson. Police say, Brown struggled with him and reached for the policeman`s gun before the shooting.

連綿的雨天緩和了弗格森群眾的憤怒，自手無寸鐵的非裔美國人被白人警察槍殺之后整個小鎮(zhèn)居民都處于爆發(fā)的邊緣?？棺h者中一些人采取了暴力行為，之后便一發(fā)不可收拾。大多數人都支持18歲的邁克爾布朗。據目擊者稱當8月9號警員Darren Wilson射擊布朗時布朗正試圖投降。一些游行示威者開始轉而支持警官Wilson。警方稱，布朗與他在他開槍之前產生了爭執(zhí)。

A grand jury has been assembled. This is a group of people who will look at the evidence and decide whether Officer Wilson should be charged with the crime. That process could take several weeks.

陪審團已經成立，這是一個尋求證據并決定警員Wilson是否被指控犯罪的團體。整個過程可能需要幾個星期。

The St. Louis district attorney`s office tells me that there`s no timeline on this case. Now, that being said, this has begun to be already a very complicated case.

圣路易斯地區(qū)檢察官辦公室告訴我，解決此事件沒有時間限制?，F在，整個案件已經非常復雜。

Eyewitness testimonials is always problematic, because different people see things in different ways. You`ve probably seen the eyewitnesses that have come and given interviews. Well, they probably gave at least one statement to police. They are giving interviews on television maybe even newspapers and then finally, testimony at trial. If there`s a trial. Different times can produce different variations of events, and that leads to inconsistencies, which does not help the prosecution.

目擊者的證詞都有出入，因為不同目擊者看事件的方式都不同。你可能見過目擊者來進行采訪，他們可以給警方至少一種說辭，他們有的可能在電視上被接受采訪，有的可能在報紙上接受采訪，但是最終他們會在審判庭上發(fā)表自己的言辭。不同時期的事件可能產生不同的變化，導致不同的結果，最終不助于起訴。

Another big complication is, there is another side to the story. Officer Darren Wilson`s side. Now, we have heard from a friend of his who recounts the story in a vastly different way from eyewitnesses, and that can be a major complication to what is the truth.

另外此事件還有另一個版本，就是警員Darren Wilson版本。我們現在已經從他的朋友那邊聽到了與目擊者提供證詞完全不同的說法，這也對澄清事實真相至關重要。

A third complication can be the autopsy report. Forensics, ballistics, we do have a private autopsy report, preliminary in nature from Dr. Michael Baden, and there are drawings that show the entrance wounds, they appear to all be frontal entrance wounds, and this is contradictory to what some of the eyewitnesses have said on CNN.

第三種說法是來自法醫(yī)的鑒定。取彈，彈道學，我們確實有一份私人尸檢報告，是來自Michael Baden醫(yī)生的原始鑒定報告。一些圖紙表明傷口的入口似乎都是從正面切入的，這與目擊者提供的證詞有出入。

There will be three autopsies in this case. We know the state autopsy, the private autopsy and federal autopsy. There may be different conclusions.

該案件將會有三種尸檢形式，有政府驗尸，私人解剖和聯邦解剖。所以會產生不同的結論。

The first autopsy had access to the majority of the items. The clothes, X- Rays, witness statements, the car, maybe even a statement from the officer. The private autopsy didn`t have access to that. So, their conclusions may be very different from the state`s autopsy.

第一次尸檢成功提取到了大量信息，衣服，X射線，目擊者陳述，汽車，甚至來自警方的聲明。私人驗尸則沒有發(fā)現這些。所以他們的結論可能與政府的檢驗結果不同。

One critical question will be whether Michael Brown`s DNA is found on the gun, because one side to the story is that there was a struggle for the gun, and Michael Brown tried to grab the gun. That DNA will be critical. But remember, DNA isn`t always transferred. Even if somebody touches a gun, possible another complication of this case.

一個關鍵的問題將是是否邁克爾布朗的DNA在槍支上被找到，因為有證詞表明當時雙方因槍支發(fā)生了爭執(zhí)，邁克爾布朗也試圖奪取槍支。DNA則會是解開謎題的關鍵。但是記住，DNA不總會留下，即使是有人觸摸了手槍，也可能是另外一種情況。